SCOTUS kicks off its new term today, and there are a lot of hot-button issues on deck. People that care are waiting with bated breath to see if the most recent additions to the Court, now that they've had some time to settle in, will be able to successfully swing the Court back hard right and stop the accursed secular-progressive juggernaut from damning the soul of our great nation.
According to some really smart people, the fate of the world hinges on the mysterious and unpredictable whims of our very own Justice Kennedy.
"It's hard to understate the significance of Justice Kennedy," said Douglas Kmiec, a onetime Justice Department lawyer in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, who now teaches law at Pepperdine University.
"The problem for both the more liberal side of the court and the more conservative side is that neither fully understands Justice Kennedy," he added. "They work rather conscientiously at trying to understand his perspective, and winning him over."
Despite CJ Roberts' ambitious goal of a cohesive and unanimous Court, last term saw more 5-4 decisions than we have seen in years, and Kennedy was in the majority in every single one. This basically means that HUGELY important issues are being decided by a single person, a state of affairs that makes me pretty nervous.A number of other wild card factors are also present this term, which could make for a tumultuous and unpredictable judicial season.
Beyond the caseload, the individual dynamics among justices on the high court's bench could also play out along interesting storylines, among them:
In spite of all the uncertainty and apprehension hovering over the bench like a storm cloud, I am very excited about what this term might hold, and am crossing my fingers that any surprises that might occur end up being favorable to my position. Stay tuned. It could get interesting.
2 comments:
Thanks, Clarince T, for speaking on behalf of the nearly-always-silent AKen. Seriatim is basically the negative of the real world: Here, AKen doesn't make any decisions.
You're welcome.
I wonder if Conservapedia would leave up a page entitled "Secular-Progressive Juggernaut"?
Post a Comment