Monday

Hill's Tats


Jenna Hansen resides in Madison and probably has a job. She wrote a letter to the editor of the The Capital Times (it's short, so that's why I think, unlike Frank Lasee, she may have a real profession) complaining about the Clinton cleavage climate:

I cannot believe that Madison's "Progressive Newspaper" would dare print an article about Hillary Clinton's cleavage! It turned me off so much I recycled the whole LifeStyle section without even reading on!

Was she so mad that she couldn't throw the paper in the garbage? Is Jenna Hansen a tree-hugger commenting on how she was almost too mad to recycle the paper, a tree-hugger who thinks that reading a paper reduces its recyclic value, or an eco-terrorist so momentarily angry with the world that she recycled to demonstrate to her eco-terrorist parents that she won't live under their evil, evil regime any more? So many questions.

"Yes, Hillary Clinton has breasts. We are all well aware of that. Does The Capital Times really believe that this kind of garbage is what we want to read?"

Does the Capital Times think some of its audience is interested in boobies? hA! What a silly organization they are... In Ms. Hansen's defense, Hill's breastices aren't the most conversationally-attractive one could pick, but let's not hate the player in the stead of the game. Plus, the Cap Times is a bastion of knowledge: Let us suck at its teat.

1 comment:

AKen said...

damn shame you hated that environmental law class so much, JP. i have a feeling you wouldn't be so virulently anti-environmental otherwise. i know, the very idea of recycling touches a nerve. but, to rail against recycling before exalting breasts - where are your priorities?